Monthly Archives: December 2011

Claimant entitled to commence second adjudication after allowing first to lapse

Claimant entitled to commence second adjudication after allowing first to lapse

The Court of Appeal held in Lanes Group Plc v Galliford Try Infrastructure Limited that a party starting adjudication proceedings by issuing a Notice of Appointment was entitled to allow those proceedings to lapse by not filing a Notice of Referral within the time limit and then issue a second Notice of Appointment, in order to avoid the adjudication being conducted by the first appointed adjudicator (whom it believed to biased against it). The Court of Appeal disapproved of the forum shopping, as it characterised it, but decided it there was nothing in principle that could prevent it. Druces’ Litigation and Dispute Resolution team has recent experience regarding jurisdiction in adjudication proceedings and can advise further

Posted in News and Comment | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off

Merry Christmas

Merry Christmas

A very merry Christmas to all our clients, contacts and visitors. We hope that you all have a peaceful break and look forward to making contact with you all shortly

From everyone at Druces LLP

Posted in News and Comment | Comments Off

Court of Appeal confirms that TUPE applies to sales out of administrations

Court of Appeal confirms that TUPE applies to sales out of administrations

Confirming the approach taken by the Employment Appeal Tribunal in OTG v Barke, the Court of Appeal decided in the case of Key2Law (Surrey) LLP v De’Antiquis on 20 December 2011 that administration proceedings under Schedule B1 of the Insolvency Act 1986 cannot  constitute “insolvency proceedings which have been instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor” within the meaning of regulation 8(7) of the TUPE Regulations 2006. The decision means that in a sale of business by administrators the employees rights under TUPE should not  be ignored or discounted.  This decision is clearly as significant  for buyers of business as for administrators.

Posted in News and Comment | Comments Off

Part 36 applies to offers made and accepted before issue of claim

Part 36 applies to offers made and accepted before issue of claim

The Court of Appeal has confirmed in Solomon v Cromwell and Oliver v Doughty that steps taken by parties before proceeding are started are to be treated as proceedings under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules, whether or not a claim is ultimately issued. This important clarification means that a party who accepts a Part 36 offer before a claim is issued will become liable for any costs consequences arising out of that acceptance, even though proceedings have not been issued. We will file a full briefing note shortly

Posted in News and Comment | Comments Off

Director’s failure to notify company did not invalidate administrators’ appointment

Director’s failure to notify company did not invalidate administrators’ appointment

A decision of the High Court last week has largely dispelled the uncertainty about the process by which directors make out of court appointments of administrators. In the case, called Bezier Acquisitions Ltd, the court held that an out of court appointment was valid, even though the directors did not comply with the provisions of Rule 2.8 Insolvency Rules by serving the insolvent company with notice of their intention to appoint administrators. The uncertainty about this had come about as a result of another High Court judgment earlier this year, known as the Minmar case. If you require further information, please speak to Richard Baines, Partner, Turnaround, restructuring & insolvency

Posted in News and Comment | Comments Off

High Court trial to evict protest camp at St Paul’s begins

High Court trial to evict protest camp at St Paul’s begins

The trial of the Corporation of London’s application to clear areas of its land around St Paul’s occupied by Occupy London’s tented protest settlement is due to start on Monday 19 December and is projected to last 4 days. The Corporation will allege that the the protest settlement is a public nuisance and that the right to protest does not amount to create a permanent or semi-permanent settlement. The Corporation’s claim documents and evidence have been filed online on the Corporation’s website. Judgment is not expected until 2o12 and an appeal is almost certain

Posted in News and Comment | Comments Off

Domicile and Residence: taxation implications

Domicile and Residence: taxation implications

Summary: Helen Freely, a Partner in Druces’ Private Client team explain the basic rules relating to domicile and residence and their impact on UK taxation

Relevant to: Persons with residence and domiciles abroad

Private Client and Taxation Briefing Note Domicile and Residence (December 2011)

Posted in Briefing Notes, Private Client Briefing Notes, Tax Briefing Notes | Leave a comment

Cookie laws Guidance issued by the ICO

Cookie laws Guidance issued by the ICO

The Information Commissioner’s Office has revised its guidance on complying with new laws on the use of cookies by website owners. The new guidance contains more detail on the meaning of consent and other practical steps which can be taken, but also a warning that the ICO expects website owners to be able to demonstrate the steps they are taking and the timescale for compliance.

Posted in News and Comment | Leave a comment

Rent as an expense in administration

Rent as an expense in administration

Summary: The question as to whether rent due to a landlord can be recovered as an expense of the administration of a corporate tenant (and therefore ahead of most other creditors) or whether it remains recoverable only as an unsecured debt is one that has generated significant litigation over the years. Richard Baines, head of Druces’ Turnaround, Restructuring & Insolvency team, examines the issues

Relevant to: Insolvency and legal practitioners, commercial landlords

Download a copy BTRI briefing note: Rent as administration expense (December 2010)

Posted in Briefing Notes, Dispute Resolution Briefing Notes, Property Briefing Notes, Turnaround, Restructuring & Insolvency Briefing Notes | Leave a comment

Media may use Twitter in Court

Media may use Twitter in Court

The Lord Chief Justice issued guidance today on the use of Twitter in Court. According to the guidance, legal commentators and representatives of the media can now live Tweet in Court. Members of the public still need the permission of the Court. Lord Judge commented that “The use of an unobtrusive, hand held, silent piece of modern equipment for the purposes of simultaneous reporting of proceedings to the outside world as they unfold in court is generally unlikely to interfere with the proper administration of justice“.  A copy of the guidance can be found at the Ministry of Justice website.

 
Posted in News and Comment | Leave a comment